>>> On 21.11.17 at 18:20, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 11/21/2017 11:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 21.11.17 at 11:56, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> On 11/21/2017 08:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>> +### PV USB support for xl >>>>> + >>>>> + Status: Supported >>>>> + >>>>> +### PV 9pfs support for xl >>>>> + >>>>> + Status: Tech Preview >>>> >>>> Why are these two being called out, but xl support for other device >>>> types isn't? >>> >>> Do you see how big this document is? :-) If you think something else >>> needs to be covered, don't ask why I didn't mention it, just say what >>> you think I missed. >> >> Well, (not very) implicitly here: The same for all other PV protocols. > > Oh, I see -- you didn't read my comment below the `---` pointing this > out. :-)
Oops, sorry. > Yes, I wasn't quite sure what to do here. We already list all the PV > protocols in at least 2 places (frontend and backend support); it seemed > a bit redundant to list them all again in xl and/or libxl support. > > Except, of course, that there are a number of protocols *not* plumbed > through the toolstack yet -- PVSCSI being one example. > > Any suggestions would be welcome. How about putting that as a note to the respective frontend / backend entries? And then, wouldn't lack of xl support anyway mean "experimental" at best? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
