>>> On 21.11.17 at 19:19, <george.dun...@citrix.com> wrote: > xentrace I would argue for security support; I've asked customers to > send me xentrace data as part of analysis before. I also know enough > about it that I'm reasonably confident the risk of an attack vector is > pretty low.
Knowing pretty little about xentrace I will trust you here. What I was afraid of is that generally anything adding overhead can have unintended side effects, the more with the - aiui - huge amounts of data this may produce. > I don't have a strong opinion on gdbsx; I'd call it 'supported', but if > you think we need to exclude it from security support I'm happy with > that as well. Looks like on another sub-thread it was meanwhile already agreed to mark it not security supported. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
