>>> On 12.03.15 at 14:45, <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > Patch below, and attached. However, I think the correct thing to do > would be to just revert 93be8285 "update domU's node-affinity on the > cpupool_unassign_cpu() path", wouldn't it?
Indeed - if the presented patch is what we want, it should be carried out as a revert. But you'll then want to explain why you did what you did there in the first place: It surely wasn't without reason, and hence I'd be afraid the revert would re-introduce another problem. That explanation should then probably go in as description for the revert. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
