>>> On 16.03.15 at 18:59, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hence was wondering if it would just be easier to put > this patch in (see above) - with the benfit that folks have > an faster interrupt passthrough experience and then I work on another > variant of this with tristate cmpxchg and ->mapping atomic counter.
Considering how long this issue has been pending I think we really need to get _something_ in (or revert); if this something is the patch in its most recent form, so be it (even if maybe not the simplest of all possible variants). So please submit as a proper non- RFC patch. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
