On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Mark Salter <msal...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 09:54 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 23:58 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Ian Campbell <
> ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >       On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 13:34 +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > > >       > Hi,
> > > >       >
> > > >       > I have been experiencing a problematic crash running Xen on
> m400 over
> > > >       > the last few days.  I already spoke to Ian and Stefano about
> this, but
> > > >       > thought I'd summarize what I've seen so far and loop in a
> wider
> > > >       > audience.
> > > >       >
> > > >       > The basic setup is this:
> > > >       >  - Two m400 nodes, one running Linux bare-metal, the other
> running
> > > >       > Xen.
> > > >       >  - The Xen node runs Dom0 and 1 DomU
> > > >       >  - The m400 has a Mellanox Connectx-3 PCIe 10G ethernet card
> with two
> > > >       > parts on it
> > > >       >  - Dom0 uses NAT forwarding from Dom0's eth0 (which is
> connected to
> > > >       > the internet) and regular bridging to eth1 which is
> connected to a
> > > >       > private VLAN to the bare-metal node
> > > >       >  - Dom0 and DomU are configured with 14GB of ram, 4 cpus each
> > > >       >  - DomU runs apache2 serving the GCC manual (see
> > > >       >
> https://github.com/chazy/kvmperf/blob/master/cmdline_tests/apache_install.sh
> )
> > > >       >
> > > >       > The bare-metal node runs apache bench, like this: "ab -n
> 100000 -c 100
> > > >       >
> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1r5tZ8-7RF8gHRANwFdizEZzgeMsjxVO0yKbYiV4zy7LeiUfYBXMkFq7FGW_SZ1x-VxdzyK-ErDsOUiQ9z2x-N
> > > >
> y7XkL_loHP8ene_BuNFscGyWmQ3r6CtXAYaZCY4xRmmPT1uJOsZDLMu7j-LfCOGmQDSdBwgW7QYukI2bCtTrXM/http%3A%2F%2F10.10.1.120%2F
> > > >       gcc%2Findex.html"
> > > >       >
> > > >       > (10.10.1.120 is the DomU IP address of the bridged interface
> to eth1)
> > > >       >
> > > >       > What happens now is that the entire Xen node goes down.  I
> see various
> > > >       > errors in the kernel log, some examples:
> > > >       > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10642148/
> > > >       > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10642177/
> > > >       > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10642181/
> > > >       > http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/10635573/
> > > >       >
> > > >       >
> > > >       > All Linux kernels are 3.18 plus some tweaks for the m400
> cartridge:
> > > >       >
> https://github.com/columbia/linux-kvm-arm/tree/columbia-armvirt-3.18
> > > >
> > > >       Is it worth adding
> > > >
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?id=285994a62c80f1d72c6924282bcb59608098d5ec
> > > >       to your kernel? It isn't Xen specific but it's perhaps
> possible that Xen opens the window wider.
> >
> > You definitely want that one. Without it, the page table walker could
> > end up using a stale pointer to a page being used for something other
> > than page tables.
> >
> > > >
> > > >       How confident are you in
> > > >
> https://github.com/columbia/linux-kvm-arm/commit/5e29cb0478f3d90e4f568d6bea6840960331bcbb
> ?
> > > >       (although I suppose you aren't running in ACPI mode if you are
> running
> > > >       Xen?)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm not confident at all, but Linux (last I checked was v3.19)
> doesn't boot without it, so not sure if there's an
> > > > alternative?  Mark?
> > >
> > > This patch is key: it doesn't look like it is setting
> > > dev->archdata.dma_coherent appropriately, see the implementation of
> > > set_arch_dma_coherent_ops.
> >
> > You'd want this if booting with ACPI. You might also need it for
> > enumerated PCI devices even if booting with devicetree.
>
> There's an updated version of this patch for newer kernels in the
> devel branch of git.fedorahosted.org/git/kernel-arm64.git
>
> There is also this one in Linus' tree which may be of interest to you:
>
> commit 7132813c384515c9dede1ae20e56f3895feb7f1e
> Author: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poul...@arm.com>
> Date:   Thu Mar 19 18:17:09 2015 +0000
>
>     arm64: Honor __GFP_ZERO in dma allocations


Thanks Mark!

I'll give both a try!

-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to