On 03/28/2015 05:12 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 27/03/15 02:35, Kai Huang wrote:
It's possible domain has already been in log-dirty mode when creating vcpu, in
which case we should enable PML for this vcpu if PML has been enabled for the
domain.

Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.hu...@linux.intel.com>
---
  xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 453bcc5..fce3aa2 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -116,6 +116,30 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
          return rc;
      }
+ /*
+     * It's rare but still possible that domain has already been in log-dirty
+     * mode when vcpu is being created (commented by Tim), in which case we
+     * should enable PML for this vcpu if PML has been enabled for the domain,
+     * and failure to enable results in failure of creating this vcpu.
+     *
+     * Note even there's no vcpu created for the domain, vmx_domain_enable_pml
+     * will return successful in which case vmx_domain_pml_enabled will also
+     * return true. And even this is the first vcpu to be created with
+     * vmx_domain_pml_enabled being true, failure of enabling PML still results
+     * in failure of creating vcpu, to avoid complicated logic to revert PML
+     * style EPT table to non-PML style EPT table.
+     */
+    if ( vmx_domain_pml_enabled(v->domain) )
+    {
+        if ( (rc = vmx_vcpu_enable_pml(v)) != 0 )
Given the comment here, is the assertion in the top of
vmx_vcpu_enable_pml() liable to trip?
Do you mean below assertion at beginning of vmx_vcpu_enable_pml might not work here?

    ASSERT(!vmx_vcpu_pml_enabled(v));

To me it asserts for this particular vcpu, not the domain, so even in this case the assertion is reasonable and should work fine, shouldn't it?


+        {
+            dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Failed to enable PML for vcpu %d\n",
+                    v->vcpu_id);
Please use %pv to identify the domain as well as vcpu.
Sure.

Thanks,
-Kai

~Andrew

+            vmx_destroy_vmcs(v);
+            return rc;
+        }
+    }
+
      vpmu_initialise(v);
vmx_install_vlapic_mapping(v);

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to