On 03/30/2015 07:04 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Sorry, not '&&'.
Phew. :-) > It was the '(i * 8)' vs '(i*8)' Yeah, as you can probably tell style isn't one of the things I'm very particular about (at least compared with a lot of other developers). I think what you had originally was probably closer in line with what's in xentrace.c. >> So do you want to take this patch and put it into your series (making >> all the changes you suggest), or do you want me to polish it up and send >> it separately? > > I will take it in, do the changes, and also test it on a large machine. > Thought should I wait until you are done looking at the other patch? Sure, I should have that done here shortly. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
