On 31/03/15 14:22, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 14:07 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> On 31/03/15 12:57, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >>> >>> I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and >>> could be applied, could you let me know how far through the acked bit of >>> the series you think it would be sensible to apply now? >>> >>> If there are any acked bits which follow unacked bits but which are >>> independent then let me know and I'll see if they can be applied. >> >> Patch up to #15 (except #7 which miss an ack from Jan) can be pushed. >> >> Although some of them contains nits. If it convenient for you, I can >> resend the series with the nits fixed and patch sorted in order to apply >> the first part. > > That would be super, thanks.
I will resend this series in 2 parts. First part will contains all the patches acked than can be applied now. The second part the rest of the series. I will send the first part today and the second part later. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
