On 13/04/15 13:14, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > Monday, April 13, 2015, 2:07:02 PM, you wrote: > >> On 13/04/15 12:21, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >>> >>> Monday, April 13, 2015, 11:50:51 AM, you wrote: >>> >>>> On 13/04/15 10:39, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >>>>> Hi David, >>>>> >>>>> I seem to have spotted some trouble with a 4.0 dom0 kernel with the >>>>> devel/for-linus-4.1 branch pulled on top. >>>>> >>>>> Does this remind you of any specific commits in the devel/for-linus-4.1 >>>>> branch that could >>>>> likely be involved that i could try to revert ? >>> >>>> Yes. This will probably be 4e8c0c8c4bf3a (xen/privcmd: improve >>>> performance of MMAPBATCH_V2) which makes the kernel try harder to map >>>> all GFNs instead of failing on the first one. >>> >>>> I think this is qemu incorrectly trying to map GFNs. >>> >>>> David >>> >>> Reverted that specific one, but still get those messages. > >> You'll have to bisect it then. Because I don't see any other relevant >> commits in devel/for-linus-4.1 > >> David > > Ok .. hmm first candidate of the bisect also looks interessting: > [628c28eefd6f2cef03b212081b466ae43fd093a3] xen: unify foreign GFN map/unmap > for auto-xlated physmap guests
Unless your dom0 is PVH, no. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
