On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:03:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 09:32 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Ian C, thoughts? Just ditch this patch? > > I think so, my original suggestion to include the logging was predicated > on it not being usual for us to look up a non-existent domid, but the xl > domid usecase was one which didn't occur, and is a very valid reason not > to do this. > > Alternatively could crank the log level all the way down to DEBUG, I'm > happy either way (at least until someone tells me why I'm not!).
Nah, lets ditch it. > > Ian > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
