On 04/16/2015 10:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 16:09 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org>
I've left the XSM related quotes untrimmed and CCd Daniel. I think it's
all code motion (making x86 specific things generic), so perhaps no ack
needed but an opportunity to nack instead ;-)
This seems correct to me. My initial thought when looking at this problem
was that a distinct XSM hook for the ARM hypercall would be better, but
other than the minor overhead from doing the IRQ label lookups twice, there
is no real reason to prefer that method. This method has the advantage
of not making more architecture-specific hooks which are sometimes harder
to test/maintain.
Acked-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgde...@tycho.nsa.gov>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
