>>> On 21.04.15 at 16:15, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:01 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 20/04/15 12:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>>> On 20.04.15 at 12:49, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> >> @@ -103,12 +88,20 @@ install: install-man-pages install-html
>> >>  
>> >>  # Individual file build targets
>> >>  man1/%.1: man/%.pod.1 Makefile
>> >> +ifdef POD2MAN
>> > Perhaps better to use ifneq($(POD2MAN),) in such cases?
>> 
>> I was following the prevailing style, but can update all instances. 
>> FWIW, it is not currently an issue.
> 
> I don't really mind, ifneq seems more prevalent in other makefiles, I'm
> not sure why this one uses ifdef nor really what the implications are.

The difference becomes visible when the variable is defined but
expands to nothing. And I view it as more useful if as empty
variable means "none" than if that results in presumably very
strange build errors.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to