On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 11:12 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 06.05.15 at 11:02, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > > Adding a trailing redundant -rc (with or without the N) might help, and > > omitting the N (e.g. "5.0.1-rc") would reduce the redundancy to near > > zero. > > Good suggestion. > > > Was 5.0-rcN leading to a 5.0 release considered and ruled out? > > It wasn't mentioned in the discussion I think, but ... > > > I suppose > > it looses the benefit of the numeric portion sorting properly. > > ... based on this I had rules it out before that (and hence didn't > even bring it up as a possibility). And using 5.0-rcN to lead to a > 5.1.0 release would become odd/misleading the latest for > subsequent stable release RCs.
Right, I had meant 5.0-rc leading to a 5.0(.0) release. (Anyway I'm ok with "5.0.1-rc", so it doesn't matter) Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel