>>> On 08.05.15 at 18:49, <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> On 05/08/2015 07:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 06.05.15 at 19:12, <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -193,6 +200,11 @@ struct vm_event_xsetbv {
>>> uint64_t value;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +struct vm_event_emul_read_data {
>>> + uint32_t size;
>>> + uint8_t data[164];
>>
>> This number needs an explanation.
>
> It's less than the size of the x86_regs and enough for all the cases
> we've tested so far...
I was afraid of an explanation like that, which clearly cannot be
taken as a proper basis for a decision regarding a pubic interface.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
