On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 10:05 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 09:32 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> > > While it'd be really nice to do so, the flight here didn't test the tip of
> > > staging (onto which I'll push the revert in a few minutes), so a force
> > > push may be a little difficult to arrange. I'm also afraid that doing so
> > > would yield the XSM build failure an allowable one going forward.
> > > Otoh, considering that we got two almost-pushes recently, I'm quite
> > > hopeful that we'll get a real push pretty soon.
> >
> > And sadly 6ea9f0481e ("xen: guestcopy: Provide an helper to
> > safely copy string from guest") breaks the x86 XSM build too (due
> > to type issues with the compat mode layer of flask's hypercall
> > handling). Reverting that one would be more cumbersome (as I
> > suppose subsequent changes depend on it), but I very much
> > hope that you, Julien, will provide a timely fix for this.
>
> Yes, please.
>
> There's no point my killing 55228 until then.
I've applied Julien's fix and killed this flight.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
