On 11/05/15 13:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 12:56 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 11/05/15 12:36, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 22:14 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>>> There are some records which should only be sent once in the stream, and
>>>> not
>>>> repeated for each checkpoint. {start,end}_of_stream() become
>>>> per-checkpoint,
>>>> and a new start_of_stream() is introduced.
>>>>
>>>> There is no resulting change record order, but the X86_PV_INFO and
>>>> X86_PV_P2M_FRAMES records are positively identified as once per stream,
>>>> rather
>>>> than once per checkpoint.
>>> In the case of the latter judging from the comments this is currently an
>>> implementation detail and in principal we want to be able to resend the
>>> p2m frames as well?
>> Correct, and the spec regarding X86_PV_P2M_FRAMES was explicitly
>> intended to allow partial updates in the future.
>>
>> It is currently an implementation bug (or many) that the P2M can't
>> change during the live part of migration.
> In which case I'd suggest avoiding saying "positively identified as once
> per stream" since that gives the impression that this is per the spec
> rather than just the current implementation.
Ok - I will adjust the comments.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
