On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 15:33 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 05/11/2015 03:23 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 16:15 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > >> On Thu, May 07, George Dunlap wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: > >> > >>>> tools/xentrace/xenalyze/Makefile | 21 + > >> > >>> I personally think it would make more sense to just put the xenalyze > >>> directory in tools/. > > > > What (if anything) is the relationship between xentrace and xenalyze? > > > > I think the latter post processes the result of the former, is that > > right? > > Yes. So someone might argue that, both having to do with the xen > tracing system, they should live in the same directory; that's where > xentrace_format lives, after all. > > However, all xentrace does is basically map the hypervisor buffers and > dump them to disk. Other than that, there is no functional overlap > between them. > > It looks like olaf is only checking in the core xenalyze binary, not the > other side bits (like the html documentation), so keeping them in the > same directory might make sense.
You mean to put xenalyze directly into xentrace (i.e. merging it with the current contents)? > > -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
