>>> On 11.05.15 at 16:37, <david.vra...@citrix.com> wrote:
> @@ -53,6 +67,19 @@ void __bad_atomic_size(void);
> } \
> })
>
> +#define add_sized(p, x) ({ \
> + typeof(*(p)) __x = (x); \
> + unsigned long x_ = (unsigned long)__x; \
So is there a particular reason you kept this double type conversion?
As said earlier, I can see why write_atomic() wants it, but I don't see
the need here.
Jan
> + switch ( sizeof(*(p)) ) \
> + { \
> + case 1: add_u8_sized((uint8_t *)(p), x_); break; \
> + case 2: add_u16_sized((uint16_t *)(p), x_); break; \
> + case 4: add_u32_sized((uint32_t *)(p), x_); break; \
> + case 8: add_u64_sized((uint64_t *)(p), x_); break; \
> + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; \
> + } \
> +})
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
