>>> On 15.05.15 at 09:11, <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote: > On 2015/5/15 14:56, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 15.05.15 at 08:39, <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote: >>> On 2015/5/15 14:25, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>> On 15.05.15 at 08:11, <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote: >>>>> Even we may separate the >>>>> low memory to construct memory_map.map[]... >>>> >>>> ??? >>> >>> Sorry I just mean that the low memory is not represented with only one >>> memory_map.map[] in some cases. >> >> That's correct. >> > > So just lets keep that original BUG_ON()?
In your previous reply you seemed to agree that the BUG_ON() is becoming meaningless. Why do you now suggest to keep it then? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
