>>> On 18.05.15 at 15:26, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>> +#include <xen/acpi.h>
>> +#include <asm/mm.h>
>> +
>> +void __iomem *
>> +acpi_os_map_iomem(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
>> +{
>> + return __va(phys);
>> +}
>
> I would have prefer two distinct patch: one for the refactoring of
> acpi_os_map_memory and the other for implementing the ARM part
> explaining why only using __va.
+1
> Although, given that acpi_os_map_memory only call acpi_os_map_iomem. I
> would move acpi_os_map_memory per-architecture. FWIW, it's what Linux does.
In which Linux version did you see this to be the case? Certainly
not 4.1-rc or anything recent... What I'm trying to get at is that
we should please be very careful with deviating from the ACPI CA
derived naming as well as with what is to live in os.c.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
