"Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> writes: >>>> On 27.05.15 at 17:25, <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote: >> This patch series provides x86 PVHVM domains with an ability to perform >> kexec/kdump-style operations. > > Before I get to look at this latest version, may I go a step back and > ask for clarification whether all of these (seemingly fragile) > manipulations are actually needed (such a rationale for the series > would btw be quite good to have in the overview mail, rather than > having to wade through mailing list history). In particular, why is it > that we need a new domain in the first place? After all, native > kexec doesn't imply a new physical machine either. Perhaps that > was discussed a long while back, but I can't seem to find any of > that now that I would like to read through it again.
Yes, here are some highlights from last year's discussion: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg01908.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg01979.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-08/msg01918.html -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
