On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:55 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > I don't know if we should introduce a new name for this, but I wanted to > point out that this is different from PVH from Xen point of view. In > particular most of the outstanding PVH work items (32bit, AMD) on the > hypervisor would be redudant if we get this to work, right? If that is > the case, then I think it is best we agree on which road we want to take > going forward as soon as possible to avoid duplicated or wasted efforts.
I think what you are saying is we either want to pursue this path _or_ PVH, but not both, and I would be inclined to agree, it seems to me like duplication of both effort and functionality to do both. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
