On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 23.06.15 at 16:16, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > This reverts commit f5b43e95facdc17f925cb56a8963cd4531074034. > > Even if the patch having introduced the regression this fixed is > being reverted, it's not clear to me why this change needs to be > reverted too - it seems correct to me to use 64-bit types for the > calculations. Or are you planning to do a more comprehensive > adjustments to all of the types later on? >
I was thinking more about giving Ian (who is looking at making things consistent) a clean state to start with. He may end up touching those types. This patch itself looks correct to me. Ian, I think I will send a patch to revert the only offending commit and fix up conflicts. Are you OK with that. Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
