On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Julien Grall wrote: > On 23/06/15 15:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Yes, you are right, I was reading an older version of Linux that still > > had xen_remap_domain_mfn_range properly implemented. > > > > The new function is called xen_remap_domain_mfn_array which calls > > xen_xlate_remap_gfn_array. > > > > I'll rephrase my question then: What about xen_remap_domain_mfn_array? I > > guess we don't support that use case on 64K guests? If so, I would > > appreaciate an assert and/or an error message. > > See https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/563
Ah, that's fantastic! In that case: Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel