"Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> writes:
>>>> On 26.05.15 at 15:32, <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> @@ -1709,9 +1709,9 @@ bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, vaddr_t gla,
>> const struct npfec npfec)
>>
>> /*
>> * Set access type for a region of pfns.
>> - * If start_pfn == -1ul, sets the default access type.
>> + * If start_gfn == -1ul, sets the default access type.
>> */
>> -long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long pfn, uint32_t nr,
>> +long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long start_gfn, uint32_t
>> nr,
>> uint32_t start, uint32_t mask, xenmem_access_t
>> access)
>> {
>> struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(d);
>> @@ -1752,14 +1752,15 @@ long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned
>> long pfn, uint32_t nr,
>> p2m->mem_access_enabled = true;
>>
>> /* If request to set default access. */
>> - if ( pfn == ~0ul )
>> + if ( start_gfn == ~0ul )
>> {
>> p2m->default_access = a;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> rc = apply_p2m_changes(d, MEMACCESS,
>> - pfn_to_paddr(pfn+start), pfn_to_paddr(pfn+nr),
>> + pfn_to_paddr(start_gfn + start),
>
> Particularly due to this expression I'm not really happy about the
> start_ prefix that you're adding here, but I'll let the maintainers
> of the respective pieces of code decide if they're happy with it.
Sorry for the ping but it has been almost one month...
--
Vitaly
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
