> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel- > boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Jan Beulich > Sent: 24 June 2015 16:37 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: Andrew Cooper; Keir (Xen.org); xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/hvm: only call hvm_io_assist() > from hvm_wait_for_io() > > >>> On 24.06.15 at 13:24, <paul.durr...@citrix.com> wrote: > > By removing the calls in hvmemul_do_io() (which is replaced by a single > > assignment) and hvm_complete_assist_request() (which is replaced by a > > call to process_portio_intercept() with a suitable set of ops) then > > With this saying hvm_process_io_intercept() ... >
Ah, good spot :-) > > hvm_io_assist() can be moved into hvm.c and made static (and hence be a > > candidate for inlining). > > > > This patch also fixes the I/O state test at the end of hvm_io_assist() > > to check the correct value. Since the ioreq server patch series was > > integrated the current ioreq state is no longer an indicator of in-flight > > I/O state, since an I/O sheduled by re-emulation may be targetted at a > > different ioreq server. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Thanks. Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
