>>> On 03.07.15 at 18:22, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 01/07/15 19:09, Ed White wrote:
>> Add the basic data structures needed to support alternate p2m's and
>> the functions to initialise them and tear them down.
>>
>> Although Intel hardware can handle 512 EPTP's per hardware thread
>> concurrently, only 10 per domain are supported in this patch for
>> performance reasons.
>>
>> The iterator in hap_enable() does need to handle 512, so that is now
>> uint16_t.
>>
>> This change also splits the p2m lock into one lock type for altp2m's
>> and another type for all other p2m's. The purpose of this is to place
>> the altp2m list lock between the types, so the list lock can be
>> acquired whilst holding the host p2m lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ed White <edmund.h.wh...@intel.com>
> 
> Only some style issues.  Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
> <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>

To be honest, with coding style issues having been pointed out
before, them left un-addressed in more just an occasional instance
moves me towards ignoring such a submission altogether. Please
help reviewers and maintainers by addressing _all_ of them even
if only a few (or just one) got pointed out during review. This also
helps you by avoiding to do another round just for addressing
these.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to