On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 17:44 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/07/15 17:39, Ravi Sahita wrote:
> > As reported by Wei Lu on July 27 2015
>
> Reported-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
Which leaves an effectively empty commit message:
x86/hvm.c: fix regression in guest destruction
Reported-by: Wei Liu < wei.l...@citrix.com >
Signed-off-by: Ravi Sahita < ravi.sah...@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper < andrew.coop...@citrix.com >
Tested-by: Wei Liu < wei.l...@citrix.com >
If I were maintainer of this code I'd be very grumpy about the lack of a
commit log (What regression? What is the fix? Why is it correct?) for this
patch. I asked on IRC and Andy suggested instead:
x86/hvm.c: Don't tear down altp2m state if it was never set up
which I have applied with. I still don't think the commit message is very
satisfactory, but I'm not maintainer of any of this code so meh.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
