At 09:55 +0100 on 10 Aug (1439200516), Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 10/08/2015 09:52, Tim Deegan wrote: > >> Whie I agree that it would be good to account this to the domain, > >> paging->alloc_page() is an internal _paging assistance_ helper. :) > >> This new allocation is nothing to do with mm/paging-assistance, so > >> either it should find its own memory or the hap/shadow pool needs to > >> be made more generic. > > ...at which point other HVM overheads - VMCx pages, bitmaps &c - could > > be allocated from it as well. > > I agree very much in principle, but I believe other threads have > settles on all allocations being global, or per-pcpu, which means no > per-domain allocation.
Grand so. :) Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
