>>> On 14.08.15 at 16:03, <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 14.08.15 at 15:21, <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> it's even less clear how you'd expect to suppress this in other guest >> >> OSes (Windows - afaik - being able to run on ARM certainly makes it >> >> a candidate guest, even if maybe this doesn't work today), namely >> >> such not having any pcifront. And I hope this design discussion isn't >> >> limiting itself to Linux guests. >> > >> > We'll write down in the ABI documentation that BARs reassignments are >> > not supported. >> >> I.e. guests doing so Will Not Work (TM), with users (usually not reading >> ABI docs) learning it the hard way. Not nice, but a way to handle it. > > The target of the ABI docs is not users, but kernel developers, who > should most definitely read them and fix their kernels.
??? (We're talking of unmodified, closed source OSes here.) Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel