On 28/08/2015 19:18, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
>On 28/08/15 18:51, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> >> >> We may need some extra tags/headings, if we were to include things such >>as supported limits for memory, vCPUs, ... I remember, you raised the >>point that some of the theoretical limits are not always tested. > >Absolutely. Not everyone has a server with 123TB of RAM to hand, or >even 16TB which is default current limit. (For this issue, testing from >both Citrix and Oracle indicates a bug when more than 5TB of RAM is used.) > >Therefore, a distinction between the theoretical limit and >currently-tested limit is very useful. I expect the the commercial >stakeholders will be in a position to routinely test at far above the >limit available to direct consumers of the Xen project. > >For the in-tree statement of limits, I have not put much though to how >to represent them yet, but I am not sure that the feature template >proposed in #1 will be a great fit. I suspect we will want something a >little different. Maybe a master document for system stuff, with a slightly different format. I may have missed this: what kind of mark-up is being used? http://pandoc.org/ seems to support a few: may need to add a README with a couple of pointers. And I am assuming some sort of index is produced when these docs are built: correct? Lars _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel