>>> On 01.09.15 at 19:55, <jonathan.creekm...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> writes: > >>>>> On 01.09.15 at 16:29, <jonathan.creekm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Which is both appreciated and understandable. I suppose you >> agree though that if you were to follow the model used for the >> kexec part, things would quickly become unwieldy. Hence I would >> strongly suggest considering to introduce Linux'es or a >> Linux-like configure mechanism before continuing to make code >> conditionally compilable. > > Oh, I definitely agree. > > What exactly are you looking for? Are you looking for just a KConfig > type of mechanism, or a full KBuild implementation. In a previous life, > I ported both to an embedded RTOS build. I think it might be simpler to > just start with a KConfig mechanism, though. If you want, I can take a > swing at starting down that path.
Just Kconfig (I don't see any connection here to the need of a clone of the Kbuild mechanism). But give it a little time for other maintainers to voice an opinion (perhaps worthwhile spelling out the intention in a separate mail thread). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
