On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >>>> Doug Goldstein <car...@cardoe.com> 09/01/15 9:05 PM >>> >>The existing email bounces with an address rejected failure message. >>This is the email that other maintainers are using for David. >>--- >>MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >>1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >>index 73a96c9..ce194d3 100644 >>--- a/MAINTAINERS >>+++ b/MAINTAINERS >>@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ F: config/MiniOS.mk >>F: extras/mini-os/ > > >>OCAML TOOLS >>-M: David Scott <dave.sc...@eu.citrix.com> >>+M: David Scott <dave.sc...@citrix.com> >>S: Supported >>F: tools/ocaml/ > > > > I think such an adjustment should normally come from the person involved; at > the very least we'll need David's consent (or someone at Citrix to confirm > only > that new address is expected to work - iirc there are various other people > with > working @eu.citrix.com addresses). > > I'm also not certain whether - trivial and non-technical or not - we can > accept a > patch without Signed-off-by tag. > > Jan >
Agreed. I had been trying to email him regarding some OCaml bits and was getting a bounce and around the same time Wei forwarded my OCaml patch to the email address I referenced in the patch. Just trying to help others out when they're confused why an email bounces that they got from get_maintainers.pl -- Doug Goldstein _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
