On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:46:35AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 09.09.15 at 09:31, <ko...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > The ACPI PM timer is sometimes broken on live migration. > > Since vcpu->arch.hvm_vcpu.guest_time is zero in most cases. > > I.e. in other than "delay for missed ticks mode". Would have been > nice if you had spelled this out explicitly. With that the question > then is - should the field perhaps be used when non-zero, and the > function only be called otherwise? > > Wei - regardless of the answer to the above (i.e. regardless of > whether a v2 is going to be needed) I think we want this in 4.6. >
Yes. I think so. I will leave the technical side to you and Andy. Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
