OK, that explanation is fine to me as long as it's made clear no
security guarantee once admin uses 'relax' for any domain. Tiejun
could you resend patch with right warning/error type?
Sure, but a little bit makes me confused when I'm trying to address
this. Actually most messages are same, except for logevel, so I did this
like,
printk(XENLOG_G_INFO VTDPREFIX " Assign %04x:%02x:%02x.%u"
" with shared RMRR at %"PRIx64" for Dom%d.",
seg, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn),
rmrr->base_address, d->domain_id);
if ( relaxed )
printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING VTDPREFIX " It's really risky.");
else
printk(XENLOG_G_ERR VTDPREFIX " So it's disallowed!");
printk(XENLOG_G_INFO VTDPREFIX "\n");
But looks its not better, so any idea?
Thanks
Tiejun
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
