On 09/15/2015 02:58 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 01:55:15PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Olaf Hering <o...@aepfle.de> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 15, George Dunlap wrote: >>> >>>> It's very reasonable for you to expect it to be fixed on non-SELinux >>>> systems. But what you did is fix it for non-SELinux systems by simply >>>> breaking it on SELinux systems -- that's not at all reasonable. >>> >>> Konrad did some testing at that time and said 4.5 was ok. >>> Why is 4.6 broken now? >> >> OK -- I see that he committed it, but I didn't see him say that he had >> tested this particular patch. It would be interesting to find out why >> it worked for him. > > It just worked out of the box when I installed an source build of the Xen > on a virgin Fedora box. > > I am not sure how it worked if SELinux ended up being disabled!
So how did you install Xen? "make install"? Or did you do "make rpmball"? Is it possible that /usr/sbin/xenstored never got the default selinux label, and so never had any issues from the fact that /var/lib/xenstored also didn't have the proper label? -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel