>>> On 18.09.15 at 21:19, <ta...@tklengyel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com >> wrote: >> I have nothing in principle against having a SET_REGISTERS flag instead >> of a SET_EIP one, but I am unsure of how (and where) that would be best >> implemented. What do you have in mind? A handler similar to void >> vm_event_register_write_resume() where we set these registers for the >> respective vcpu? Is this even possible at vm_event response handling time? >> > > No, that function falls under a switch on rsp.reason, for which we have a > 1:1 unofficial and not really enforced rule to match the type of event that > was sent. This should fall under a flag on rsp.flags and be handled similar > to how vm_event_toggle_singlestep is.
I.e. I take this to mean that we should wait for a new patch rather than further looking at the current one. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel