On 09/22/2015 05:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > One other thing I just discovered: there are other consumers of the > topology sibling masks (e.g. topology_sibling_cpumask()) as well. > > I think we would want to avoid any optimizations based on those in > drivers as well, not only in the scheduler.
I'm beginning to lose the thread of the discussion here a bit. Juergen / Dario, could one of you summarize your two approaches, and the (alleged) advantages and disadvantages of each one? Thanks, -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
