>>> On 24.09.15 at 14:07, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 05:50 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> a specific error type >> to me seems to go too far. Surely out of the several dozen >> possibilities a handful of not-so-common ones can be picked? > > I was thinking in particular EINVAL was not in the not-so-common bracket.
Which I fully agree with. > The current code already uses 9 values FWIW. Right, but ENXIO would e.g. seem to be a reasonable fit for "Unable to set code or data CBM when CDP is disabled". Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
