On 10/06/2015 05:11 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:51 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 10/06/2015 03:40 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 12:39 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:

And for the record, if my google-fu doesn't fail me, it's possible to
load shared library into python interpreter using "dl" module in 2.7
and
"ctypes" module in 3.x.

Possible, but not especially convenient since you need to convert the C
prototype manually, plus the result is not necessarily very "pythonic".

I could totally see why people would prefer these bindings (or an
argument
for us providing a ctypes based wrapper).

How often is such a debugging interface being used? Please consider
the amount of code (my patch removed nearly 3000 lines of code!) and
the availability of the xl wrapper.

My understanding was that this was used by the "xen-bugtool" stuff in
XenServer, so for actual functionality (gathering debug info) and not
debugging (I supposed that the reference to being used for debugging was
due to the name of the tool).

And this functionality isn't available via the xl bindings?

I always thought that a use case like this was one of the motivations
to introduce libxl.


Juergen

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to