> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 6:41 PM > To: Hu, Robert <robert...@intel.com> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.campb...@citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; > Jin, Gordon <gordon....@intel.com>; Zheng, Di <di.zh...@intel.com>; > xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org > Subject: RE: [OSSTest Nested v12 03/21] Allow runvars to specify guest disk > and ram size (turning previous values into defaults) [and 2 more messages] > > Hu, Robert writes ("RE: [OSSTest Nested v12 03/21] Allow runvars to specify > guest disk and ram size (turning previous values into defaults)"): > > And sorry I haven't got a chance to read your replies/patches until now. > > So many test tasks almost crushed me. > > That's fine, of course. We all have other things we are doing. > > > I'm going to read your mails in the coming week. > > Thanks. I see Ian Campbell has replied to several already. > > > Hu, Robert writes ("RE: [OSSTest Nested v12 16/21] Add PDU power method > for nested L1 and L2 guest"): > > Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]: > > > Robert Ho writes ("[OSSTest Nested v12 16/21] Add PDU power method > for > > > nested L1 and L2 guest"): > > > > For nested host/guest, its power on/off method shall be > > > > its host invoke $(toolstack)->create/destroy method. > > > > > > Thanks for this patch, which I have substantially edited for my v14. > > > > > > However, I notice that it was missing a signed-off-by. Can you please > > > confirm that I should add your s-o-b ? > > > > Sorry I forgot to add my s-o-b. Yes, please add mine. > > Of course only one of us ought to be rebasing this series at once, > because otherwise it will be difficult for us to merge our work. > > In my mail > Subject: [OSSTEST PATCH v14 PART 2 10-26/26] Nested HVM testing > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 20:15:05 +0100 > I handed the series back to you. > > So I think it is you who need to add your own s-o-b to that patch.
Yes I planned to do so. > > (I don't imply any criticism of you with this detailed explanation. I > just don't want any misunderstandings; nor do I want this minor work > item to be dropped.) > > > Likewise: > > > > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com] > > > Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:15 AM > > > To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org > > > Cc: Hu, Robert <robert...@intel.com>; Ian Campbell > > > <ian.campb...@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>; > Ian > > > Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > > > Subject: [OSSTEST PATCH 15/26] DhcpWatch::leases: Fix a reporting > message > > > > > > This talks about `guest_check_ip', but this code is now factored out > > > into a method. Use the correct method name in reporting. > ... > > Ack. > > If you meant > Acked-by: Robert Ho <robert...@intel.com> > then it would be better if you wrote that explicitly. Get it. > > And of course as current custodian of the branch, it is up to you to > record your own ack in it. This may seem a little odd, but it is the > standard approach when dealing with a series containing contributions > from multiple people. Yes, understand. I'm learning the upstream rules. > > > I've read your other emails and Ian's replies and I think you should > be unblocked now ? So I'm expecting more questions, bug reports, > etc., and hopefully eventually a v15. Do not hesitate to ask again > for help. Yeah, I will report issues I found on each specific patch you posted. > > > Regards, > Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
