On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:47:37AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Ah, yes, in cases like this it should always be followed by return > (or whatever else is suitable). Sorry for not having spotted this > during review. > Sorry for this bug. Is it proper to fix this bug by just adding a return after ASSERT_UNREACHABLE? Or do some changes in ASSERT_UNREACHABLE?
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
