>>> On 26.10.15 at 12:13, <hamedrostamz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Did you look at the code generating the stats? >> >> No.
Then may I suggest you do so, since ... >> C0 gets accounted >> to everything not explicitly accounted to any other C state (i.e. only >> C1...Cn get explicit stats maintained). >> >> I dont think so. C0 only accounted when all parts of cpu being on. I was > wondering if cpu_down turns off the cpu, why the 20 second sleep is > considered as C0? ... this is being answered by what I said (i.e. how the statistics for C0 get calculated). Meaning "I don't think so" as an answer implies you see a bug in the code, which then I would expect you to spell out. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
