>>> On 03.11.15 at 14:39, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 05:50 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> That's certainly an option on x86 too, the more that the x86_64/ >> subtree is a remnant of x86_32 days only anyway. Just that doing >> this will mean quite a bit more work (not the least because, to be >> done properly, I think it implies merging files from x86_64/ into their >> [formerly] shared files where sensible). > > FWIW IMHO compiling arch/x86/x86_64/*.c from arch/x86/Makefile now and then > tackling the merging as and when it makes sense would be fine.
Great. It's on my list to do this merge (in steps) anyway. So does this mean I can go ahead and commit both this and patch 1, i.e. at least kind-of-an-ack? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
