On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:51 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > In fact, right now, failing at destroying a cpupool is just
> > not reported to the user in any explicit way.
> > 
> > Let's log an error, as it is customary for xl in these cases.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>

This conflicted with the changes to use EXIT_(ERROR|SUCCESS). By changing
"return 0" into "return EXIT_SUCCESS" and "return 1" into "return
EXIT_ERROR" in the context it applied cleanly. 

I was about to apply when I noticed the strange Reviewed-by: Jueregen
(having already spotted and fixed in the Cc). I don't think I want to apply
it like that. Please can you fix and rebase (after I push Harman's changes
soon) and resend.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to