On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org>
>
> Add a new function to parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI just
> like the way for normal UEFI. Then it could reuse the existing codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 67
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> index d6144e3..629bd06 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <xen/xen.h>
>
> struct efi __read_mostly efi = {
> .mps = EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR,
> @@ -488,12 +489,60 @@ static __initdata struct {
> UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Desc. Version", "linux,uefi-mmap-desc-ver", desc_ver)
> };
>
> +static __initdata struct {
> + const char name[32];
> + const char propname[32];
> + int offset;
> + int size;
> +} xen_dt_params[] = {
> + UEFI_PARAM("System Table", "xen,uefi-system-table", system_table),
> + UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Address", "xen,uefi-mmap-start", mmap),
> + UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Size", "xen,uefi-mmap-size", mmap_size),
> + UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Desc. Size", "xen,uefi-mmap-desc-size", desc_size),
> + UEFI_PARAM("MemMap Desc. Version", "xen,uefi-mmap-desc-ver", desc_ver)
> +};
> +
> struct param_info {
> int verbose;
> int found;
> void *params;
> };
>
> +static int __init fdt_find_xen_uefi_params(unsigned long node,
> + const char *uname, int depth,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct param_info *info = data;
> + const void *prop;
> + void *dest;
> + u64 val;
> + int i, len;
> +
> + if (xen_initial_domain() && (depth != 2 || strcmp(uname, "uefi") != 0))
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(xen_dt_params); i++) {
> + prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, xen_dt_params[i].propname,
> + &len);
> + if (!prop)
> + return 0;
> + dest = info->params + xen_dt_params[i].offset;
> + info->found++;
> +
> + val = of_read_number(prop, len / sizeof(u32));
> +
> + if (dt_params[i].size == sizeof(u32))
> + *(u32 *)dest = val;
> + else
> + *(u64 *)dest = val;
> +
> + if (info->verbose)
> + pr_info(" %s: 0x%0*llx\n", xen_dt_params[i].name,
> + xen_dt_params[i].size * 2, val);
> + }
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> static int __init fdt_find_uefi_params(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> int depth, void *data)
> {
> @@ -538,12 +587,20 @@ int __init efi_get_fdt_params(struct efi_fdt_params
> *params, int verbose)
> info.found = 0;
> info.params = params;
>
> - ret = of_scan_flat_dt(fdt_find_uefi_params, &info);
> - if (!info.found)
> + if (xen_initial_domain())
> + ret = of_scan_flat_dt(fdt_find_xen_uefi_params, &info);
> + else
> + ret = of_scan_flat_dt(fdt_find_uefi_params, &info);
> + if (!info.found) {
> pr_info("UEFI not found.\n");
> - else if (!ret)
> - pr_err("Can't find '%s' in device tree!\n",
> - dt_params[info.found].name);
> + } else if (!ret) {
> + if (xen_initial_domain())
> + pr_err("Can't find '%s' in device tree!\n",
> + xen_dt_params[info.found].name);
> + else
> + pr_err("Can't find '%s' in device tree!\n",
> + xen_dt_params[info.found].name);
xen_dt_params is obviously wrong here
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
