On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 09:16 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > The use of $(basename ...) here was wrong (yet I'm sure I tested it).
Is the issue here that xen/arch/x86/x86_64/.compat.o.d ought really to be xen/arch/x86/.x86_64.compat.o.d? Otherwise xen/arch/x86/Makefile (which contains obj-y := ... x86_64/compat.o) does not correctly track the dependencies of that file? But that being the case I'm then confused, since it doesn't seem that the currently wrong version is missing the .o or anything like that which is what I would have expected the basename to be doing. This is all in a recently built x86_64 tree (the one I used when building before push earlier today). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > --- a/xen/Rules.mk > +++ b/xen/Rules.mk > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ include Makefile > DEPS = .*.d > define gendep > ifneq ($(1),$(subst /,:,$(1))) > - DEPS += $(dir $(1)).$(basename $(notdir $(1))).d > + DEPS += $(dir $(1)).$(notdir $(1)).d > endif > endef > $(foreach o,$(filter-out %/,$(obj-y)),$(eval $(call gendep,$(o)))) > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
