On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org> > > Here we map these new created EFI and ACPI tables to the non-RAM space > of Dom0. Then Dom0 could visit them.
"Map the UEFI and ACPI tables which we created to non-RAM space in Dom0." > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.z...@linaro.org> > --- > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > index 073c634..55f85b4 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > @@ -1740,6 +1740,21 @@ static int prepare_acpi(struct domain *d, struct > kernel_info *kinfo) > acpi_create_efi_mmap_table(d->arch.efi_acpi_gpa, d->arch.efi_acpi_table, > &kinfo->mem, tbl_add); > > + /* Map the EFI and ACPI tables to Dom0 */ > + rc = map_regions(d, > + paddr_to_pfn(d->arch.efi_acpi_gpa), > + DIV_ROUND_UP(d->arch.efi_acpi_len, PAGE_SIZE), PFN_UP > + paddr_to_pfn(virt_to_maddr(d->arch.efi_acpi_table))); > + if ( rc != 0 ) > + { > + printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to map 0x%"PRIx64 > + " - 0x%"PRIx64" in domain %d\n", > + d->arch.efi_acpi_gpa & PAGE_MASK, > + PAGE_ALIGN(d->arch.efi_acpi_gpa + d->arch.efi_acpi_len) - 1, > + d->domain_id); > + return rc; > + } > + > return 0; > } > #else > -- > 2.1.0 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel