On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 17:04 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 15:22 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: 02 December 2015 15:21
> > > To: Paul Durrant; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> > > Cc: Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini; Wei Liu
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] libxl: re-implement libxl__xs_printf()
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 13:55 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > This patch adds a new libxl__xs_vprintf() which actually checks the
> > > > success of the underlying call to xs_write() (logging if it fails)
> > > > and
> > > > then re-implements libxl__xs_printf() using this (and replacing the
> > > > call to vasprintf() with a call to libxl__vsprintf()).
> > > 
> > > Is the addition of libxl__xs_vprintf() an end in itself (i.e. do you
> > > have
> > > an upcoming use for it) or just an artefact of how you decided to fix
> > > libxl__xs_printf()?
> > > 
> > 
> > It's an artefact but seemed sufficiently useful to expose.
> 
> Thanks:
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>

And now applied, sorry for the delay.

The comment on libxl__xs_mknod in the context was different but I resolved
that, hopefully correctly!

Did you have any other of these updates available? IIRC there were two
series and both are now in, but there might be a third?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to