>>> On 15.12.15 at 15:50, <konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:19:45AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 08.12.15 at 12:02, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 02:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> Then we should see about adding support for "efi=no-time". >> > >> > And based on what I'm reading in this thread about the reliability of the >> > time RS in the field it seems to me we should make it the default (on x86 >> > at least) and provide efi=time to opt in. >> >> Which would get us to actively violate at least early versions of the >> spec (the current one doesn't appear to be as strict anymore). I'm >> fine making it easy to work around the issue, but I'm against us doing >> the wrong thing by default. > > Are you OK with DMI quirks?
Sure, why not? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel